In FY23, textile exports plunged by $2.8 billion (15% decline) compared to FY22, derailing positive developments achieved over the last two years. This decline, along with a provisional 13% decrease in June-23 compared to June-22, requires a closer examination of causes like energy costs, liquidity crises, tax refund issues, import restrictions, non-implementation of policies, market dynamics, competition, and supply chain disruptions. Recognizing and addressing these factors is crucial to reverse the decline. However, a misinformed narrative has distorted Pakistan’s textile sector’s image, making it difficult to comprehend associated challenges and formulate well-informed policies.
Pakistan’s textile exports decreased by $2.8 billion (15%) in FY23 compared to FY22.
Source: Research Department – APTMA
Constructive developments in Pakistan’s export sector are being hindered by a number of obstructions, including problems with the devaluation strategy that is intended to increase exports. Pakistan is sensitive to currency changes because of its heavy reliance on dollar-linked inputs and foreign markets, which drives up the cost of imported inputs and reduces the profitability of exporters. To meet production demands and reduce currency impact, the industry needs a two-fold increase in working capital. However, there is a lack of readily available capital and interest rates of 22% prohibit borrowing and export growth, making it challenging to maintain export levels in dollars. The non-payment on time of FBR refunds (explained later) further restricts the recycling of funds, limiting liquidity for investment and growth.
Unreliable information and non-implementation of approved policies undermine confidence, deterring investments and stifling the growth of exports. The industry has not witnessed implementation of textile policies from the first one in 2014-2019 to the current 2020-2025 policy. If these policies had been fully implemented, it is estimated that textile exports could have increased by 25 to 40 percent annually.
Pakistan’s exportable surplus is currently only in textile, the bulk of which is largely directed towards exports. However, to increase the exports, there is a need to increase the capacity for creating the exportable surplus. To increase that exportable surplus, investments in the form of modern machinery is required for which TERF was introduced.
A hundred new textile units were set up as a consequence of TERF. Approximately 50% of them are currently operational. Once all the units start working, additional exportable surplus of between 8-10 billion dollars is expected. These units, set up under TERF, are mostly downstream and rely on the already installed capacity of spinning and weaving for intermediate products. The machinery which has been added through TERF is state-of-the-art, aimed at increasing the efficiency of the sector Hence, the country stands to gain through higher value addition.
For this capacity to operate, energy inputs at competitive rates are required, without which all these projects will not be viable anymore. New projects, upgradation, and capacity enhancement are stranded because of non-provision of electricity/gas connections to start production. More than $5 billion installed capacity, most of which has not been energized. This affects long-term productivity and global competitiveness of the industry and carries a risk of banks defaulting as the industry cannot service debt.
The funds provided through TERF were not gratis. A concessional fixed interest rate was applied for a period of 10 years, allowing for the approval of Rs. 425 billion for investment in local and imported plant and machinery. Land and building investments were not covered. The total investment generated by TERF is projected to surpass Rs. 800 billion. Commercial banks diligently evaluated each project before issuing L/C’s for the machinery portion only.
Regrettably, certain elements are attempting to cast aspersions on this scheme, aiming to portray it as a criminal endeavor. Such actions pose a significant threat to the policy continuity, investment climate, and trust in the government. If this trend persists, it will hamper progress and perpetuate the current negative economic outlook of Pakistan.
High energy costs increase operating costs to an extent that it makes it difficult for manufacturers to maintain competitiveness. The discontinuation of the Competitive Electricity Tariff (RCET) has had a devastating impact on the export industry, which has a negative impact on the Balance of Payments and the economic outlook. Export-oriented businesses suffer from cross-subsidies and stranded costs in the power tariff system, depriving them of the support essential for competitive success. Energy sources that are reliable and affordable are vital for keeping the textile industry competitive. The textile sector operates on a high volume, low-margin business. Even a small difference of 5% in costs can significantly impact profitability, as witnessed by the discontinuation of the RCET. The high energy costs have consumed the sector’s profitability, stressing the sensitivity of the industry to apparently small changes in margins.
Source: NEPRA/CPPA 2022
One critical reform required is the formation of a separate tariff category for exports without cross subsidies/stranded costs. By establishing such a category, it would promote fair competition and encourage sustainable export growth within the guidelines set by the IMF.
Punjab-based industries in Pakistan, which account for over 50% of installed capacity, have substantial operational issues as a result of differences in gas accessibility and pricing between Punjab and Sindh. While Sindh-based Export-Oriented Units (EOUs) benefit from subsidized gas supply, their operations are hindered by high gas prices, a lack of supply, and erratic electricity supply. These inequalities have a negative impact on operating capacity, shutdowns, unemployment, and circular debt. A uniform gas price of $8/MMBtu for the export industry and a reassessment of distribution based on value-added contributions to the GDP are two urgent actions that must be taken.
A competitive electricity tariff applicable across the country would to some extent overcome the gas price differential.
By tackling tax evasion and underreporting, the implementation of retail-level taxing measures in Pakistan’s textile industry can increase revenue collection. To find these glitches and execute targeted solutions, comparisons of domestic sales to under-invoiced imports need to be analyzed. Because of the current system of sales tax collection and refunds, new projects and export growth are hindered by growing inventory and capital expenditures. These problems can be solved by only charging sales tax at the point of sale for all domestically sold goods which would capture sale of all smuggled item. It is critical to balance the GST rate to decrease the danger of smuggling while assuring optimal revenue collection. Other vital initiatives include addressing the problems with used clothing imports and bringing unregistered dealers into the tax net.
The withdrawal of Zero-Rating (SRO 1125) and the imposition of an 18% General Sales Tax (GST) on export-oriented sectors have had a substantial negative impact on the industry in Pakistan especially now that the FASTER system is not working and refunds are held up. The higher cost of doing business, unsustainable working capital levels, higher interest rates, and currency depreciation have formed obstacles for new projects and export expansion. Accumulated “Deferred Sales Tax” without timely refunds and the complex refund process have further burdened the industry. To promote export growth, restoring SRO 1125, reintroducing zero rating for the textile value chain, collecting sales tax at the point of sale for domestic sales, and expediting the refund process are essential.
To improve the taxation system in Pakistan’s textile industry, the focus should shift from taxing compliant businesses to targeting potential tax evasion practices among industries and retailers. Questioning the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) emphasis on taxing compliant businesses does not ensure a fair and equitable tax system. Redirecting attention towards retailers helps identify instances of tax evasion, promoting a level playing field.
APTMA has been instrumental in fostering collaboration and conducting research in the textile industry. Their cooperative efforts with government bodies and industry experts provide valuable insights for policymakers. APTMA’s advocacy for technological advancements, investment attraction, and innovation has enhanced efficiency, stimulated growth, and created employment opportunities. Recognizing APTMA’s contributions underscores the need for ongoing collaboration to ensure sustainable development in the textile sector.
Addressing misconceptions and providing accurate information is crucial for Pakistan’s textile industry to make informed policy decisions and ensure progress. Creating an export-culture is sine qua non. Selective allocation of funds to prioritize the export sector and focus on economic challenges will drive sustainable job creation, foreign investment, and economic growth. Prompt action, consensus building, and critical reforms are needed to address energy tariffs, taxation, and promote export facilitation, propelling the economy forward. Policymakers must consider the long-term implications of their decisions to enhance the industry’s competitiveness, generate employment, and increase exports for sustainable economic development.